And Or Theory

Thoughtfulness and the exactitudes of space, the predicaments of involvement and the meaning in any given glance or gesture. The relevance of timing and great guessing for fabricative coincidence are easy to stage, the concordances of thought are beyond knowledge and according to perspective and any triviality therein.

The idea of ideas beyond their actuality in communication, and the ramifications of any particular way of thinking. Gestured relevance and the suggestive sense of conditioning toward that which is taken as meaningful or as that which has cause. The guessed significance of outside observation will never be as accurate as a first hand account, and the insinuation of absolute meaning or cause upon any action does not mean the reality of that action or that whatever guessing could be taken as anything but manufactured response and fabricated evidence.

In wanting to prove shared imagination, it is not necessary to work to lay claim to others imaginary spaces, nor to attach meaning and cause where there really is none or what little there is has been skewed by observers. Spaciousness and the vast reaches of imagination, the reaches of thought and the separations of imagination, the indicative nature of imagining the past or future, the ways in which imagination can be confused for reality easily, and especially in record of mental or imaginary event. The need for accurate record and fair use, the need for privacy and the respect of private space and private work don’t need warped for a sense of togetherness or shared data, that which is meant to be shared, is, and doesn’t need taken out of context to mean assault of privacy.

The definitions of space and conditions of interest condoning the need for free thought, but just barely, and reaching for intensities of curiosity and involvement in ideas. The idea itself and all its involvement intended beyond false relations, the data itself beyond false associations and unfair uses, the separation of data from its relationships is necessary to information reliability sometimes.

The actual data and actual ideas are well expressed enough, and don’t need poisonous mythic underpinnings to make sense or have relevance. Text is plenty of relevance and doesn’t need taken out of context or situation to mean otherwise or to have attachments that don’t make actual sense to the intended use of original text. Hopes and dreams for fair use, the past and its lessons still hardly heard and never made relevant, of the usefulness of ideas and the inability to protect something like an idea. Free thought, couldn’t name or claim something that doesn’t exist technically, but the actuality of the work and process in actually writing and working with ideas has belonging and doesn’t need re-assignment to be relevant and make sense.

Of all the far reaches of possibility, the registration of the need for free thought and every ramification therein often reminds of every potential in shared thought or shared imagination, of every past instance of excuse in mysticism used to negate privacy and diminish the actuality of the work being done in favor of mythical contexts and mystical connections.

In hopes for information reliability and free thought, the need for respect of privacy and private space cannot be negated, nor bargained with.