Formulaic values of space, the indicatives in static and the ways in which morphological space is made. The potentials in surrounding gradient which could decipher a nutrient before its arrival and the premonition in natural intuition and instinct.
The immediacy in natural systems applicability and the wanted differences or similarities between applied and natural science, in the seeking out of actual principles beyond circumstance upon circumstance in what seems to fit or recombinate in a universe of constant change in which nothing is created nor destroyed.
The finite lines of continuer and connectivity, the variance possible in the wild and the the wanted catalysts for movement which is technically all connected. That which could seem to apply or be natural, the ease of wonderment in that which is ‘creative process’ and the natural conditions of growth and evolution in environment.
Conditioned norms and the norms that actually help our bodies survive in a natural system, these gaps and junctions in instinctual response, and the ways in which any amount of instinct could be taken out of context or used beyond its actual usefulness as part of a natural system. The indicative conditioning of epistemological values and the idea of actual growth and attachment to nature, natural systems and applied systems.
The values of space and timing the nutrients necessary to any space made for path or more possibility in growth. Pattern and paths of natural beauty, the ways in which we take notice or the indicative values in the wild, these catacholamines guessing for possible scenarios, the instinct and imagination and the ways in which we fashion environment to perspective chance.
Action and reaction, these functions of space and timing: indicative measure and the differences in potential and actual movement, the figures of variance and the reliability of instinct in conditioned environments with a lot of applied systems. Action and reaction beyond actual function, functioning themselves beyond the indicatives of differencing and the equations of time based on linearity.
The actual possibilities for deep time and the relativity in motion in accordance with other relative motion. Zero acting as a sole placeholder to define the indicatives of that which could be relative to all motion, these wanted possibilities in that which cannot be defined as any sort of constant, and which cannot escape a system of prior uses.
Zero tricking mobility and differencing in that which supposedly doesn’t move in a universe of constant motion, as supposed stillness which cannot be proven nor measured, a supposed constant which harms values of actual space in any direction. There is no ‘zero’ point, nothing does not exist, and especially not in any amount of absence.
Assuming stillness will never equate to relative motion, and we’re all always in motion.
Imagination and instinct in timing and the space necessary to indicative weight, the figures of possibility and potential and that which could be assumed based on pause or constants in motion based on fixed and fixated portions of numerical value that cannot apply to a natural system aren’t conducive to measure, and especially not to measure of connectivity or continuance, of instinct nor imagination, accident nor coincident.
