And Or Theory

The ways in which information becomes knowable, the interests of perspective and conditions of decidability. There are concentrations of thought breaking apart ledges of understanding, working for consciousness and concerned with attention.

The intensities of being beyond thought for the moments it takes to record it, the significance of thinking through the timing of anything and the need for honesty against second or third hand biases. The interests of time concerning the ways in which thought and imagination are capable of being digested, beyond time or timing there are indicatives that cannot be measured and that don’t stay the same long enough to condition to a medium of instrumentalized measurement.

Uncertainty and the need for accuracy in the record of imaginary and mental event: close enough is farther still from the actuality of indicative. Great guessing and standards of manipulation and distortion aren’t helpful to accuracy or reliability of information and could create any dynamics necessary to belief in that which is not possible. Concerns of interest and the indicative leverage of decision against making one, boundaries of curiosity and the willingness to wonder left gaps in reasoning worth trying to fill, found questions that don’t need answers to be relevant and that aren’t rhetorical.

Asked again the differences in audience and assumptions therein, there being no audience here, still inviting to the possibility of the future of whatever this is, of the usefulness in anything used or unused, and intention that cannot be guessed at. The movements of thought and its indicative counter-balancing of expression doesn’t need absolutes of meaning and cause applied. A smile is plenty.

The impression of space upon indicative potential cannot really be measured, and the closer is the further still from accuracy and honesty. Close enough to guess the relevance in chance to the volatile nature of coincidental event, or accidental event, but further still from the actuality of thought and imaginary. Impressions of possibilities and great guessing, soft data elicitation and probability: the energetics of mystics usually claiming accident and coincident through guessing games of similar instancing or the ambiguity of validity, and the want for real accuracy and information reliability beyond their faulty standards and lack of respect for privacy.

Formulaic distances of impression, the decision already made by the time you’ve made it couldn’t even then negate free will, and reverts possibilities to returns of potential and more great guessing, formulaic understanding and repetitions of use and form. Beyond any decidability (especially of large crowds), there are some things that are beyond human knowledge, and the more we test to try and fathom it, the more we are reduced to being inhumane.

There are humane ways to test and question coincident and accident, thought and imaginary, but more often than not those forms and ways are thrown to the wayside in favor of mystical contortions of reality and illegal machineries. In need of information reliability and humanity, impressions of thought and indicative fractions of writing easily become whatever the observer wants. The relevance of space and the timing necessary to indicative refusal of measure, the containment hazards and investments of thought against sense and removals of self pardoned and parted, impressions of existence and the need for private spaces.

The necessity in being beyond thought for the moments of its record, again, concentrations of discernment and invocations of imagination that isn’t necessarily shared. Of all the possibilities in daylight, in dreaming, in the record of imaginary and mental event, again, the instances of timing that could share or spare the proximities necessary to senses of togetherness and the refusal of limits in absolutes applied as though all meaning and all cause.

Already decided, it’s already been decided, the significance of anything or the possibilities in knowledge and perspective: in hopes against absolutions against free thought and any wonderment. Perspectives of decided knowledge applying conditions of learned impressions, wondering the forms of validity and the decidable nature of any amount of knowledge.

Imagined limits of sense and the repercussions of any amount of questioning: impressions of space and the acknowledgement of that which is beyond most understanding, the want for shared imagination, the existence of shared impressions and inspiration itself.